For the C/DM, only short-term memory deficit status significantly predicted posttest word reading¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Only C/DM short-term memory deficit status was a significant predictor of posttest word reading; all other C/DM criteria and all fluency and comprehension comparisons were non-significant. No standardized effect size is printed in the supporting text for this contrast. → Miciak Jeremy 2016

Evidence¶

Miciak Jeremy 2016¶

Miciak Jeremy, Williams Jacob L., Taylor W. Pat, Cirino Paul T., Fletcher Jack M., Vaughn Sharon. (2016). Do Processing Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses Predict Differential Treatment Response? Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 898-909. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000096

q3 · i? · associational · r2

C/DM inclusionary-criterion ANCOVAs (Table 4) for the same 206 fourth graders. The results section reports that "only short-term memory deficit status was a significant predictor of posttest performance in word reading"; no effect size is printed in this sentence.

"For the C/DM, only short-term memory deficit status was a significant predictor of posttest performance in word reading."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Working Memory — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• A few XBA inclusionary criteria modestly predict word reading only, with very small eta squared values (η2 range .008 to .018) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• C/DM LD status likewise does not predict posttest reading outcomes beyond pretest performance — related
• The XBA and C/DM PSW methods show chance-level agreement (kappa = -.10) in identifying LD among fourth graders with reading comprehension deficits — related
• XBA LD status does not predict posttest reading outcomes beyond pretest performance in decoding, fluency, or comprehension — related