Stronger working relationships emerged among highest-level central office administrators, but rifts and skepticism about systemic change remained among other staff¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Working relationships were stronger among central office administrators at the highest levels, while rifts and skepticism about systemic change persisted among other staff. → Moira McCullough 2015
Evidence¶
Moira McCullough 2015¶
Moira McCullough, Luke Heinkel, Betsy Keating. (2015). Seeking Common Ground: Early Lessons in District-Charter School Collaboration. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/seeking-common-ground-early-lessons-in-districtcharter-school-collaboration
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Qualitative implementation analysis drawing on interviews with central office administrators and school principals and teacher focus groups in district-charter collaboration grant sites. The report states "rifts and skepticism about systemic change remained among other staff."
"Stronger working relationships emerged among central office administrators at the highest levels, but rifts and skepticism about systemic change remained among other staff."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Leaders at city, central office, and school levels are perceived to play a key role in promoting cross-sector collaboration — related
- Principal supervisors in PSI and other urban districts reported similar perceptions of central office support and structures — related
- Interviews with 13 education leaders from Kentucky and California, two states with contrasting teacher-evaluation approaches, provided the data for the collaborative grounded theory analysis — related
- The PSI did not improve teachers' perceptions of principals' performance — related
- Principal supervisor roles in PSI districts differed from other urban districts in key ways while supervisors' work with principals showed important similarities — related
- District leaders can use a data-driven approach to understand and address opportunity gaps in advanced course-taking — related
- Colorado uses a local-first, state-supported model in which districts and local providers initiate cross-sector work and state policy scales successful innovations — related
- Cross-sector collaboration is less widespread among school leaders than central office administrators but is particularly strong among participants in grant-funded intensive leadership training or principal residency programs — related
- Districts and principal supervisors made substantial changes to principal supervision as a result of the PSI — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
central-office-relationships-stronger-at-top-with-rifts-among-other-staff |
title |
Stronger working relationships emerged among highest-level central office administrators, but rifts and skepticism about systemic change remained among other staff |
description |
Stronger working relationships emerged among highest-level central office administrators, but rifts and skepticism about systemic change remained among other staff |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
recheck_by |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — moira-mccullough-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.