Claims

The PSI did not improve teachers' perceptions of principals' performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers' perceptions of principals' performance showed no improvement attributable to the PSI. → Ellen B. Goldring 2020

Evidence

Ellen B. Goldring 2020

Ellen B. Goldring, Melissa A. Clark, Mollie Rubin, Laura K. Rogers, Jason A. Grissom, Brian Gill, Tim Kautz, Moira McCullough, Michael Neel, Alyson Burnett. (2020). Changing the Principal Supervisor Role to Better Support Principals: Evidence from the Principal Supervisor Initiative. Mathematica and Vanderbilt University. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/changing-the-principal-supervisor-role-to-better-support-principals-evidence-from-the-principal doi:10.59656/el-ls5579.001

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The report's key findings include a null result: "The PSI did not improve teachers’ perceptions of principals’ performance." This is one of the PSI's measured effects on teachers' perceptions; no effect size is printed.

"The PSI did not improve teachers’ perceptions of principals’ performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id psi-no-improvement-teacher-perceptions-of-principals
title The PSI did not improve teachers' perceptions of principals' performance
description The PSI did not improve teachers' perceptions of principals' performance
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ellen-b-goldring-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.