Claims

CG-based form-focused instruction is at least moderately effective in fostering mostly explicit grammatical knowledge of the English present tense/progressive

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Cognitive-grammar-based instruction improved Polish senior high school students' mostly explicit knowledge of the present simple/progressive with stative and dynamic verbs. → Jakub Bielak 2010

Evidence

Jakub Bielak 2010

Jakub Bielak, Mirosųaw Pawlak. (2010). Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 365-400. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1136451

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with pretest, immediate posttest and delayed posttest; 50 Polish senior high school students in three intact-class groups (COG n = 21, TRAD n = 15, CTRL n = 14) took a written discrete-item grammar test. On the explicit-knowledge measure "COG improved by 7.26 points" from pretest to Posttest 1, against a 3-point control gain attributed to practice effect.

"These data reveal that all the groups improved from the pretest to Posttest 1, although the scores of the two experimental groups rose much more sharply than those of CTRL; COG improved by 7.26 points, TRAD by 11.14 points, while CTRL by mere 3 points."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.