Claims

Students show the highest learning gains in classes that are both challenging and where students actually do work aligned with teachers' expectations; grades are higher in challenging classrooms with high support than in easier classrooms with little support

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students show the highest learning gains in classes that are challenging and where students actually do work aligned with their teachers' expectations. → Allensworth 2018 q2 i? Grades are higher in challenging classrooms with high levels of teacher support than in classrooms where work is easier but the teacher provides little support. → Allensworth 2018 (2)

Evidence

Allensworth 2018

Allensworth, E.M., Farrington, C.A., Gordon, M.F., Johnson, D.W., Klein, K., McDaniel, B., & Nagaoka, J. (2018). Supporting social, emotional, & academic development: Research implications for educators. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/page/presentations

q2 · i? · review · r?

The review reports, citing Allensworth, Gwynne, Pareja, Sebastian, & Stevens (2014) and Kane & Cantrell (2010), that "Students show the highest learning gains in classes that are not only challenging, but also where students are actually doing the work." Neither challenge alone nor effort on unchallenging work suffices. No effect size printed.

"Students show the highest learning gains in classes that are not only challenging, but also where students are actually doing the work that aligns with their teach ers' expectations."

Allensworth 2018 (2)

Allensworth, E.M., Farrington, C.A., Gordon, M.F., Johnson, D.W., Klein, K., McDaniel, B., & Nagaoka, J. (2018). Supporting social, emotional, & academic development: Research implications for educators. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/page/presentations

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Allensworth et al. (2014), a support-by-challenge contrast: "grades are higher in challenging classrooms with high levels of support than in classrooms where the work is easier, but the teacher provides little support." Descriptive grade comparison; no effect size printed.

"In fact, grades are higher in challenging classrooms with high levels of support than in class rooms where the work is easier, but the teacher provides little support."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id challenge-plus-support-highest-gains
title Students show the highest learning gains in classes that are both challenging and where students actually do work aligned with teachers' expectations; grades are higher in challenging classrooms with high support than in easier classrooms with little support
description Students show the highest learning gains in classes that are both challenging and where students actually do work aligned with teachers' expectations; grades are higher in challenging classrooms with high support than...
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — allensworth-2018, allensworth-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.