Displaced students in receiving schools with high student-teacher trust and teacher personal attention showed larger reading and math gains than those in low-support schools¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Students in schools with low teacher personal attention were two months behind expected in reading, while those in the highest-quartile schools learned somewhat more than expected; low-trust schools showed students more than three months behind in reading. → Marisa de la Torre 2009
Evidence¶
Marisa de la Torre 2009¶
Marisa de la Torre, Julia Gwynne. (2009). When Schools Close: Effects on Displaced Students in Chicago Public Schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago Urban Education Institute. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/when-schools-close-effects-displaced-students-chicago-public-schools
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Moderator analysis using CCSR survey measures of student-teacher interaction (Figure 10): teacher personal attention reading ranged -2.11 (Q1) to +0.90 (Q4), student-teacher trust reading -3.23 (Q1) to +0.64 (Q4); effects significant for reading (p < 0.01) and math (p < 0.05 or 0.01), more pronounced for reading than math.
"students who enrolled in schools where there was a high level of trust between students and teachers had achievement levels of over half a month higher in reading and one month in math than expected. Students who were in schools with a low level of trust between students and teachers were more than three months behind their expected level in reading"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- School closings showed no statistically significant long-term effects on displaced students' reading or math achievement two and three years later — related
- Displaced students in the highest-achieving receiving schools gained about a month in reading and over two months in math above expectations, while those in the weakest schools lost achievement — related
- Students show the highest learning gains in classes that are both challenging and where students actually do work aligned with teachers' expectations; grades are higher in challenging classrooms with high support than in easier classrooms with little support — related
- Academic impacts of closures hinge on the quality of receiving schools, and fewer than half of displaced students transfer to higher-performing schools — a broader claim this one bears on
- One year after leaving closing schools, displaced students' reading and math achievement returned to expected levels, with no additional negative or positive effects — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-relationships-moderate-displaced-student-gains |
title |
Displaced students in receiving schools with high student-teacher trust and teacher personal attention showed larger reading and math gains than those in low-support schools |
description |
Displaced students in receiving schools with high student-teacher trust and teacher personal attention showed larger reading and math gains than those in low-support schools |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — marisa-de-la-torre-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.