Claims

The character-education thematic textbook also raises experimental-class posttest means well above pretest means

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the experimental class, mean scores rose from 51.8 on the pretest to 86 on the posttest. → Wuryani 2018

Evidence

Wuryani 2018

Wuryani, M. T., Roemintoyo, & Yamtinah, S. (2018). Textbooks thematic based character education on thematic learning primary school: An influence. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.2.75

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive score distributions from the experimental class (N=30 per the table total): pretest mean 51.8, posttest mean 86, with 22 students in the 81-100 band. These are descriptive statistics only; no gain test statistic is printed.

"The result of students' posttest scores with 30 students shows that the highest score achieved is 100, the lowest score is 75 and the students' mean score is 86."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.