Lottery-based charter middle schools show no average difference from traditional public schools in student behavior and school progress¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Charter middle schools that hold lotteries are neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving student behavior and school progress. → Philip Gleason 2010

Evidence¶

Philip Gleason 2010¶

Philip Gleason, Melissa Clark, Christina Clark Tuttle, Emily Dwoyer. (2010). The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/

q3 · i? · causal · r?

The experimental evaluation reports null average impacts not only for achievement but also for the non-achievement outcomes of "behavior, and school progress". No effect sizes for these outcomes are printed on this page.

"neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving student achievement, behavior, and school progress"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• On average, lottery-based charter middle schools are neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving student achievement — related
• Impacts of charter middle schools on achievement varied considerably across schools and students — related
• On average, charter middle schools' impacts on student achievement were negative but not statistically significant — related
• Charter schools, on average, show test-score impacts that are not substantially better or worse than conventional public schools — related
• Charter middle schools' success in improving college outcomes was not related to their success in improving middle school achievement — related