Charter schools, on average, show test-score impacts that are not substantially better or worse than conventional public schools¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Across eight study sites, charter schools on average produce test-score impacts that are neither substantially better nor substantially worse than those of conventional public schools. → Ron Zimmer 2009
Evidence¶
Ron Zimmer 2009¶
Ron Zimmer, Brian Gill, Kevin Booker, Stephane Lavertu, Tim Sass, John Witte. (2009). Charter Schools in Eight States: Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration, and Competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/charter-schools-in-eight-states-effects-on-achievement-attainment-integration-and-competition doi:10.7249/mg869
q3 · i? · associational · r?
The report's multi-site analysis of charter schools in Chicago, Denver, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, San Diego, Florida, Ohio, and Texas concludes there is "little evidence that charter schools, on average, are producing test-score impacts" substantially different from conventional public schools. No effect size is printed in the available text.
"Overall, there is little evidence that charter schools, on average, are producing test-score impacts that are substantially better or worse than those of conventional public schools"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- On average, lottery-based charter middle schools are neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving student achievement — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Lottery-based charter middle schools show no average difference from traditional public schools in student behavior and school progress — related
- Neither the hopes of voucher and charter supporters nor the fears of skeptics have been realized, per the authors' synthesis — a broader claim this one bears on
- In the vast majority of 22 KIPP middle schools, impacts on students' state assessment scores in math and reading are positive, statistically significant, and educationally substantial — related
- The Kauffman School's achievement impacts are higher than the average impacts found in studies of other charter schools — related
- KIPP charter middle schools produce positive, statistically significant test-score effects in reading, math, science, and social studies — related
- Little evidence that Philadelphia charter schools help or harm achievement of students in nearby district schools — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
charter-schools-test-score-impacts-comparable-to-traditional-public-schools |
title |
Charter schools, on average, show test-score impacts that are not substantially better or worse than conventional public schools |
description |
Charter schools, on average, show test-score impacts that are not substantially better or worse than conventional public schools |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ron-zimmer-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.