Post-test mean learning outcomes were 81.81 in the ChatGPT class versus 70.45 in the conventional class¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental class mean (81.81) exceeded the control class mean (70.45) on the final test. → Hakiki 2023
Evidence¶
Hakiki 2023¶
Hakiki, M., Fadli, R., Samala, A. D., Fricticarani, A., Dayurni, P., Rahmadani, K., Astiti, A. D., & Sabir, A. (2023). Exploring the impact of using Chat-GPT on student learning outcomes in technology learning: The comprehensive experiment. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 859-872. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.013
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive comparison of final-test means from the results section, with 31 respondents per class. The article states "the average value obtained between the experimental and control classes has a large difference". Printed standard deviations were 6.353 (experimental, Table 2) and 9.277 (control).
"the average value of the experimental class learning outcomes (81.81) and the average value of the control class learning outcomes (70.45), where the average value obtained between the experimental and control classes has a large difference."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Using ChatGPT during technology learning produces significantly higher post-test learning outcomes than conventional learning in a quasi-experiment of two classes of 31 students — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Final-test score distributions concentrated differently by group: the ChatGPT class peaked at interval 79-83 (32.26% of students) while the control class peaked at 56-61 (25.81%) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- ChatGPT-integrated instruction produced significantly higher post-test writing motivation scores than conventional instruction among EFL learners, with a medium effect size — related
- ChatGPT-enhanced instruction produced significantly higher overall post-test achievement in Grade 12 Quantum Theory than traditional teaching, with a large effect size (η² > 0.14) — related
- In a 16-week quasi-experiment, A-Level STEM students receiving high-frequency automated marking scored 16.8 percentage points higher on a blind-graded final mock exam than control students with human marking — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
chatgpt-experimental-mean-81-81-vs-control-70-45 |
title |
Post-test mean learning outcomes were 81.81 in the ChatGPT class versus 70.45 in the conventional class |
description |
Post-test mean learning outcomes were 81.81 in the ChatGPT class versus 70.45 in the conventional class |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hakiki-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.