Final-test score distributions concentrated differently by group: the ChatGPT class peaked at interval 79-83 (32.26% of students) while the control class peaked at 56-61 (25.81%)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The most frequent experimental-class score interval was 79-83, accounting for 32.26% of that class. → Hakiki 2023
q2 i? The most frequent control-class score interval was 56-61, with 8 students or 25.81%. → Hakiki 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Hakiki 2023¶
Hakiki, M., Fadli, R., Samala, A. D., Fricticarani, A., Dayurni, P., Rahmadani, K., Astiti, A. D., & Sabir, A. (2023). Exploring the impact of using Chat-GPT on student learning outcomes in technology learning: The comprehensive experiment. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 859-872. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.013
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Frequency distribution of final-test scores in the experimental class, presented as Figure 2. The text states the highest-frequency scores are "concentrated within the score interval of 79-83, specifically accounting for 32.26%" (10 of 31 cases).
"The analysis of Figure 2 reveals that the learning outcomes of students with the highest frequency are concentrated within the score interval of 79-83, specifically accounting for 32.26% of the total."
Hakiki 2023 (2)¶
Hakiki, M., Fadli, R., Samala, A. D., Fricticarani, A., Dayurni, P., Rahmadani, K., Astiti, A. D., & Sabir, A. (2023). Exploring the impact of using Chat-GPT on student learning outcomes in technology learning: The comprehensive experiment. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 859-872. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.013
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Frequency distribution of final-test scores in the control class, presented as Figure 3. The article reports the highest interval is 56-61 "with a frequency of 8 students or 25.81%".
"the student learning outcomes with the highest frequency are concentrated within the score interval of 56-61, specifically representing an impressive percentage of 25.81% from the overall sample."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Post-test mean learning outcomes were 81.81 in the ChatGPT class versus 70.45 in the conventional class — a broader claim this one bears on
- Using ChatGPT during technology learning produces significantly higher post-test learning outcomes than conventional learning in a quasi-experiment of two classes of 31 students — related
- CPS ninth-grade math final grade distributions show sharp peaks at 60, 70, 80, and 90 points, with students on the cusp between two grades much more likely to receive the higher grade — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
frequency-distribution-experimental-79-83-control-56-61 |
title |
Final-test score distributions concentrated differently by group: the ChatGPT class peaked at interval 79-83 (32.26% of students) while the control class peaked at 56-61 (25.81%) |
description |
Final-test score distributions concentrated differently by group: the ChatGPT class peaked at interval 79-83 (32.26% of students) while the control class peaked at 56-61 (25.81%) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — hakiki-2023, hakiki-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.