Claims

Whole-brain neural similarity between children is the same for same-gender and different-gender pairs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Subtracting different-gender from same-gender child-to-child similarity maps revealed no regions differing from zero, and regions of strong neural similarity were identical across same- and different-gender comparisons. → Kersey 2019

Evidence

Kersey 2019

Kersey, A. J., Csumitta, K. D., & Cantlon, J. F. (2019). Gender similarities in the brain during mathematics development. npj Science of Learning 4:19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0057-x

q3 · i? · associational · r2

One-sample t tests on same-gender minus different-gender intersubject-correlation difference maps across the child sample, with average similarity thresholds of r(500) ≥ 0.115, p ≤ 0.01. The article concludes children's neural activity patterns reflect one heterogeneous group rather than two gender groups.

"This whole-brain t test revealed no regions that showed a difference in neural activity (threshold: t(103) ≥ 2.62, voxel-wise p ≤ 0.01, corrected to p < 0.05 with a cluster threshold of 19 voxels)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.