Claims

Within the number processing network, girls and boys show statistical equivalence in neural maturity and no variance differences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the independently-defined number processing network (bilateral IPS, bilateral IFG, ACC), ROI analyses showed statistical equivalence between genders, no mean differences, and no variance differences. → Kersey 2019

Evidence

Kersey 2019

Kersey, A. J., Csumitta, K. D., & Cantlon, J. F. (2019). Gender similarities in the brain during mathematics development. npj Science of Learning 4:19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0057-x

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Region-of-interest analyses on the number processing network defined by an independent localizer scan (number matching > face, shape, and word matching). The article reports the regions "showed statistical equivalence, not statistical differences, and no differences in variance" with full statistics in Supplementary Table 1.

"In accord with the whole-brain analyses, these regions showed statistical equivalence, not statistical differences, and no differences in variance (Fig. 4b; t tests: max t(102) = 1.08, p = 0.28; equivalence-tests: min t1(102) = 3.82, p = 0.0001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.