Claims

The program significantly improved pupils' use of language learning strategies versus control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Experimental groups significantly outperformed control on the language learning strategies questionnaire post-test (η² = .85). → Abdelhalim 2015

Evidence

Abdelhalim 2015

Safaa M. Abdelhalim. (2015). Children Literature Based Program for Developing EFL Primary Pupils’ Life Skills and Language Learning Strategies. English Language Teaching, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n2p178

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

One-way ANOVA on the language learning strategies questionnaire post-test yielded F = 256.586, p = .0001, η² = .85, favoring experimental groups over control. The article characterizes this as a large effect.

"Table 1 reveals that there is a statistically significant difference between the two Experimental groups, and the control group students’ mean scores on the post-administration of the three life skills measures and the language learning strategies questionnaire at the level of (0.01), in favor of the experimental groups"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.