The CHSRI graduation advantage was concentrated among students least likely to graduate, exceeding six percentage points in the lowest stratum versus about two in the highest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? For the 2004 cohort, CHSRI students were more likely to graduate than similar non-CHSRI peers across all five graduation-probability strata, but the advantage was largest for the lowest stratum (slightly more than six percentage points) and smallest for the highest (about two percentage points). → Susan Sporte 2010
Evidence¶
Susan Sporte 2010¶
Susan Sporte, Marisa de la Torre. (2010). Chicago High School Redesign Initiative: Schools, Students, and Outcomes. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago, Urban Education Institute. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/chicago-high-school-redesign-initiative-schools-students-and-outcomes
q2 · i? · associational · r3
Stratified analysis of the 2004 cohort: students were grouped into five equal strata by pre-high school probability of graduating, then CHSRI and non-CHSRI graduation rates compared within strata. CHSRI students graduated at higher rates in every stratum. No effect size printed.
"Among the lowest quintile (Stratum 1), the difference in graduation between CHSRI and non-CHSRI students was slightly more than six percentage points; the difference in the fifth quintile (Stratum 5) was about two percentage points"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- CHSRI students graduated at significantly higher four-year rates than similar students, with differences of 7 to more than 9 percentage points across cohorts — related
- Nearly all CHSRI schools graduated at least as many students as predicted given the students they served — related
- Graduation rates declined by about four percentage points in the first policy year and one more the next, then recovered to nearly pre-policy levels within five years — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
chsri-graduation-advantage-largest-lowest-stratum |
title |
The CHSRI graduation advantage was concentrated among students least likely to graduate, exceeding six percentage points in the lowest stratum versus about two in the highest |
description |
The CHSRI graduation advantage was concentrated among students least likely to graduate, exceeding six percentage points in the lowest stratum versus about two in the highest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — susan-sporte-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.