Claims

CILT's first-year partnership projects emerged from national theme-team workshops

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1999 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In its first year, CILT defined a set of partnership projects with many other institutions through national theme-team workshops. → Roy D. Pea 1999

Evidence

Roy D. Pea 1999

Roy D. Pea, Robert Tinker, Marcia Linn, Barbara Means, John Bransford, Jeremy Roschelle, Sherry Hsi, Sean Brophy, Nancy B. Songer. (1999). Toward a Learning Technologies Knowledge Network. Educational Technology Research and Development (ETR&D), 47(2), pp.19-38. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00190608

q2 · i? · design · r1

The abstract reports the paper's own scope: it describes CILT's rationale and operations and "first-year progress" in defining partnership projects with many other institutions, projects that originated in national theme-team workshops. No project outcomes are reported in the abstract.

"This paper describes the rationale and operations of the Center, and first-year progress in d+ning a set of CILT partnership projects with many other institutions that came out $our national theme-team workshops."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cilt-theme-team-workshop-partnership-projects
title CILT's first-year partnership projects emerged from national theme-team workshops
description CILT's first-year partnership projects emerged from national theme-team workshops
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1999
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — roy-d-pea-1999

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.