Claims

Stevens and Slavin (1995) found statistically significant positive effects of CIRC on CAT Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary subtests, while Jewell (1994) found no statistically significant effects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the Stevens and Slavin (1995) quasi-experiment, CIRC showed statistically significant positive effects on the Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary subtests of the California Achievement Test. → Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition® 2010 q2 i? In the Jewell (1994) quasi-experiment, effects on the Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary subtests of the Gates–MacGinitie Reading Test were not statistically significant, and the WWC-calculated average effect was below the 0.25 substantive-importance threshold. → Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition® 2010 (2)

Evidence

Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition® 2010

Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition®. (2010). WWC Intervention Report, Adolescent Literacy. What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/111

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Findings section of the WWC review reporting the Stevens and Slavin (1995) matched quasi-experiment (411 treatment vs. 462 comparison students in Maryland); the WWC confirmed the reported significant positive effects on the named CAT subtests.

"Stevens and Slavin (1995) reported, and the WWC confirmed, statistically significant positive effects of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition ® on the Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary subtests of the California Achievement Test (CAT) for students in grades 2 through 6."

Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition® 2010 (2)

Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition®. (2010). WWC Intervention Report, Adolescent Literacy. What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/111

q2 · i? · review · r3

WWC review reporting the Jewell (1994) quasi-experiment (15 CIRC vs. 15 comparison classrooms) with non-significant effects; the printed average effect fell below the WWC's 0.25 substantive-importance threshold, coded i null as only the threshold is printed.

"Jewell (1994) did not find statistically significant effects of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition ® on the Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary subtests of the Gates–MacGinitie Reading Test for students in grades 2 through 6, and the WWC-calculated average effect across the two measures was not statistically significant or large enough to be considered substantively important"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id circ-comprehension-findings-mixed-across-two-quasi-experiments
title Stevens and Slavin (1995) found statistically significant positive effects of CIRC on CAT Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary subtests, while Jewell (1994) found no statistically significant effects
description Stevens and Slavin (1995) found statistically significant positive effects of CIRC on CAT Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary subtests, while Jewell (1994) found no statistically significant effects
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2010
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — cooperative-integrated-reading-and-composition-2010, cooperative-integrated-reading-and-composition-2010-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.