The electric circuit interpretation test is suitable for students with lower to moderate ability levels (-2.7 ≤ θ ≤ 1.8)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Reliability analysis using the information function and SEM showed the 10-item test fits lower to moderate ability students. → Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar 2017

Evidence¶

Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar 2017¶

Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar. (2017). Mobile Learning based Worked Example in Electric Circuit (WEIEC) Application to Improve the High School Students' Electric Circuits Interpretation Ability. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(3), 539-558. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141565

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Instrument reliability analysis of the 10-item electric circuit interpretation test, trialled on 260 students at SMAN 1 Samarinda before main field testing, using the information function and Standard Error Measurement. The article reports suitability "for students with lower to moderate ability levels".

"Figure 3 shows information that the electric circuit interpretation ability test is suitable for students with lower to moderate ability levels, which is -2.7 ≤ ≤ 1.8."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Using the mobile WEIEC application produced a significantly larger pretest-posttest gain in electric circuit interpretation ability than the control condition, with a reported 85.8% effective contribution — related
• Expert and student judgements rate the WEIEC application feasible, with Aiken's V of 0.80 from experts and 0.81 from students — related
• The adaptive algorithm's item selection produces a significantly lower SEM than fixed-form tests — related