Expert and student judgements rate the WEIEC application feasible, with Aiken's V of 0.80 from experts and 0.81 from students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Nine experts judged the WEIEC application feasible, with a mean Aiken's V of 0.80 on both materials and media aspects. → Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar 2017 q2 i? Thirty-five students in preliminary field testing rated the WEIEC application quality with a mean Aiken's V of 0.81. → Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar 2017 (2)

Evidence¶

Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar 2017¶

Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar. (2017). Mobile Learning based Worked Example in Electric Circuit (WEIEC) Application to Improve the High School Students' Electric Circuits Interpretation Ability. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(3), 539-558. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141565

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Expert judgement validation of the WEIEC application product quality using Aiken's V on a 1-5 Likert-based instrument. The article reports the score "is 0.80" for both materials and media validity, interpreted as a very good coefficient.

"Table 5 shows that Aiken's V score on the validity of the materials and validity of the media quality of WEIEC application is 0.80."

Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar 2017 (2)¶

Mitra Yadiannur and Supahar. (2017). Mobile Learning based Worked Example in Electric Circuit (WEIEC) Application to Improve the High School Students' Electric Circuits Interpretation Ability. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(3), 539-558. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141565

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Preliminary field testing with 35 students of class XII SMA 5 Samarinda assessing the revised WEIEC application. The mean Aiken's V "was 0.81", which the authors interpret as very good and as justifying progression to main field testing.

"Table 6 shows that the mean score of Aiken's V on the WEIEC application quality by the students in the preliminary field testing was 0.81."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The electric circuit interpretation test is suitable for students with lower to moderate ability levels (-2.7 ≤ θ ≤ 1.8) — related
• The Ispring Suite 8 geometry media with Google SketchUp 3D effects was judged valid by media and material experts — related
• A local-wisdom-based social studies learning model is judged feasible by expert panels, with CVR > 0 on every assessed item — related
• Using the mobile WEIEC application produced a significantly larger pretest-posttest gain in electric circuit interpretation ability than the control condition, with a reported 85.8% effective contribution — related
• Nine experts rated the PBL-based civic education teaching material eligible for learning, with an average final score of 92% — related