Claims

Clicker use improved high school Geometry students' scores on warm-up and homework quizzes reviewing previously learned content

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Most warm-up and homework quiz scores were higher in the clicker trial group than in the contrast group. → Wang et al. 2014

Evidence

Wang et al. 2014

Ye Wang, Chia-Jung Chung & Lihua Yang. (2014). Using Clickers to Enhance Student Learning in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 7(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n10p1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of one clicker-integrated Geometry class (trial, n=19) with a non-clicker class (contrast, n=28); Figure 3 shows warm-up and homework quiz scores, where "most of the warm ups and homework quiz scores in the trial group were higher". No effect size or test statistic is printed.

"According to Figure 3, the main finding was that most of the warm ups and homework quiz scores in the trial group were higher than for the contrast group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.