Clicker-group students scored consistently higher on all three chapter objective tests in Geometry¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Average objective test scores of the trial group were higher than the contrast group on all three objective tests covering chapters three, four, and seven. → Wang et al. 2014

Evidence¶

Wang et al. 2014¶

Ye Wang, Chia-Jung Chung & Lihua Yang. (2014). Using Clickers to Enhance Student Learning in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 7(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n10p1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Three objective tests of 15-20 multiple-choice questions each assessed mastery of chapters three, four, and seven; the article reports trial-group averages were "consistently higher than the contrast group on all three objective tests". No effect size is printed.

"Figure 5 clearly illustrates that the average scores of the trial group were consistently higher than the contrast group on all three objective tests."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Special Education and ELL students in the clicker group earned better objective and benchmark test scores — a broader claim this one bears on
• Clicker-group students scored higher on the 40-question STAR benchmark summative assessment — related
• Clicker use improved high school Geometry students' scores on warm-up and homework quizzes reviewing previously learned content — related
• Classroom quizzing delivered by clickers, computer software, or paper improves student performance on classroom exams in middle school and college courses — a broader claim this one bears on
• Class work completion rates were slightly lower for the clicker group when learning new content — related