Both groups increased their participation rates while using clickers, whichever period of the course they used them in¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a six-week quasi-experiment with two 5th-grade EFL groups, each group's response frequencies were highest during the weeks it used clickers. → Unal Cakiroglu 2018
Evidence¶
Unal Cakiroglu 2018¶
Unal Cakiroglu, Fatih Erdogdu, Seyfullah Gokoglu. (2018). Clickers in EFL Classrooms: Evidence from Two Different Uses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.414820
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive analysis of clicker records and observation-form data from the quasi-experiment: Group A peaked at 125 and 114 responses in weeks 3–4 (clicker weeks) and Group B at 119 and 116 in weeks 5–6 (its clicker weeks), as shown in Figures 2–4. "both Groups A and B increased their participation rates."
"Thus, while using clickers in different periods, both Groups A and B increased their participation rates."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Positive effects on participation continued after students stopped using clickers, but the quality of their answers declined — related
- Mann-Whitney tests found no significant difference in the number of answers between clicker and non-clicker groups in either experimental period — related
- Reluctant students' response rates increased more than those of active students when each group began using clickers — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.