Reluctant students' response rates increased more than those of active students when each group began using clickers¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The authors interpret their descriptive data as showing reluctant students' participation rose more than active students' when clickers were introduced. → Unal Cakiroglu 2018

Evidence¶

Unal Cakiroglu 2018¶

Unal Cakiroglu, Fatih Erdogdu, Seyfullah Gokoglu. (2018). Clickers in EFL Classrooms: Evidence from Two Different Uses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.414820

q1 · i? · causal · r1

This is the authors' interpretation (type e) drawn from the weekly descriptive participation data, not a tested subgroup comparison; no statistic or effect size is printed for it.

"Surprisingly, when each group began to use clickers, reluctant students’ response rates increased, thus leading to the conclusion that reluctant students’ participation rates increased more than those of active students ."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Positive effects on participation continued after students stopped using clickers, but the quality of their answers declined — related
• Both groups increased their participation rates while using clickers, whichever period of the course they used them in — related