The number of cliques in the forum interaction networks increased dramatically by the third iteration, while cohesion within cliques decreased¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Clique numbers increased moderately in the second iteration and dramatically in the third, implying more interaction and collaboration. → Sydney Enock Msonde 2017
Evidence¶
Sydney Enock Msonde 2017¶
Sydney Enock Msonde, Jan Van Aalst. (2017). Designing for interaction, thinking and academic achievement in a Tanzanian undergraduate chemistry course. Education Tech Research Dev (2017) 65:1389–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9531-4
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Clique analysis of the note-linking networks in both treatments across three cycles (Table 3), reported as descriptive network results with no effect size printed. The article interprets rising clique counts as more interaction and falling cohesion index values as closeness within cliques reducing as community-wide interaction increased.
"In the second iteration the number of cliques increased moderately, while in the third iteration there was a dramatic increase in clique numbers. These increases in clique numbers imply that students experienced more interaction and collaboration. The lower cohesion index implies that closeness between students within cliques reduced with an increase in community-wide interaction."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 3D VR co-creation forms a more connected, centralized, and reciprocal aggregate social network with fewer cliques than 2D digital co-creation — related
- NLC1 acted as one evenly participating group with no cliques, while NLC2 was initially directed by three central participants and did not operate as one group — related
- Students segregated into language cliques whenever allowed to choose peer interactions, despite the 50-50 enrollment design — related
- In informal social scenes, AgentSchool generates plausible traces of peripheral participation, clique formation, aggressor-induced cohesion, and opinion-leader emergence consistent with classroom social theories — related
- The NLC with the experienced teacher showed higher and more stable network density than the beginner's NLC, whose density dropped from 36% to 26% in the end phase — related
- Clique-average mathematics achievement negatively predicts the development of adolescents' academic self-concept (a BFLPE at the clique level) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.