The same quizzing or concept-mapping activity produces more learning when done without viewing the material, as retrieval, than while viewing it¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Agarwal et al. (2008), that open-book short-answer quizzes led to more forgetting over 1 week than closed-book quizzes. → Karpicke 2017
q2 i? The chapter reports, citing Blunt and Karpicke (2014), that creating concept maps without viewing texts produced better 1-week short-answer performance than creating them while studying the texts. → Karpicke 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Karpicke 2017¶
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
q2 · i? · review · r3
The chapter reports Agarwal et al. (2008), who had students answer short-answer questions with or without text access: "The open-book quiz conditions led to more forgetting over 1 week relative to the closed-book condition".
"The open-book quiz conditions led to more forgetting over 1 week relative to the closed-book condition, in which learners attempted to retrieve answers before studying the answers."
Karpicke 2017 (2)¶
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, 2nd edition, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
q2 · i? · review · r3
The chapter reports Blunt and Karpicke (2014): on a 1-week short-answer assessment students did better "when they had learned by creating concept maps without viewing the texts, as a retrieval practice activity".
"On a short-answer assessment 1 week after the learning session, students did better when they had learned by creating concept maps without viewing the texts, as a retrieval practice activity, than by creating maps while studying the texts."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
Cheat sheet type was not significantly associated with exam performance on either exam, though a moderate non-significant trend favoured self-created sheets on the final — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Retrieval practice improves long-term retention — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Concept Maps Improve Learning
- A review chapter (Karpicke 2017) reports, second-hand, experiments in which retrieval practice produced more learning than concept mapping (Karpicke & Blunt 2011) and than imagery strategies such as the keyword mnemonic (Karpicke & Smith 2012) — related
- A systematic review of 50 classroom experiments found retrieval practice yields medium-to-large benefits in most cases, but only 6% were conducted in non-WEIRD countries — a broader claim this one bears on
- Retrieval practice produces better retention than restudying, with meta-analytic reviews reporting people 2.5 times as likely to remember tested information and medium-to-large classroom effects — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students created and took peer assessments in Forms, learning through writing quiz questions and answer options — related
- Closed-book generative tasks can outperform open-book ones when learners can later reinspect the material — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
closed-book-versions-of-quizzes-and-concept-maps-outperform-open-book-versions |
title |
The same quizzing or concept-mapping activity produces more learning when done without viewing the material, as retrieval, than while viewing it |
description |
The same quizzing or concept-mapping activity produces more learning when done without viewing the material, as retrieval, than while viewing it |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — karpicke-2017, karpicke-2017-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.