Claims

Cluster membership moderated the relationship between theoretical comprehension level and both response time and accuracy in AutoTutor

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There was a statistically significant interaction between cluster and theoretical level for proportion correct scores. → Fang 2021 q2 i? There was a statistically significant interaction between cluster and theoretical level for time per question. → Fang 2021 (2)

Evidence

Fang 2021

Fang, Y., Lippert, A., Cai, Z., Chen, S., Frijters, J. C., Greenberg, D., & Graesser, A. C. (2021). Patterns of Adults with Low Literacy Skills Interacting with an Intelligent Tutoring System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00266-y

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Linear mixed-effects model with cluster, theoretical level, and their interaction predicting proportion correct; subjects as random effect. The interaction was statistically significant, F(9, 65) = 4.04, p < .001.

"For proportion correct scores, there was a statistically significant interaction between cluster and theoretical level, F (9, 65) = 4.04, p <0 . 0 0 1 ."

Fang 2021 (2)

Fang, Y., Lippert, A., Cai, Z., Chen, S., Frijters, J. C., Greenberg, D., & Graesser, A. C. (2021). Patterns of Adults with Low Literacy Skills Interacting with an Intelligent Tutoring System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00266-y

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Linear mixed-effects model with cluster, theoretical level, and their interaction predicting time per question; subjects as random effect. The interaction was statistically significant, F(9, 651) = 11.41, p < .001.

"For time per question, there also was a statistically significant interaction between cluster and theoretical level, F (9, 651) =11.41, p < 0.001."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cluster-by-level-interaction-autotutor
title Cluster membership moderated the relationship between theoretical comprehension level and both response time and accuracy in AutoTutor
description Cluster membership moderated the relationship between theoretical comprehension level and both response time and accuracy in AutoTutor
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — fang-2021, fang-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.