Claims

Classroom movement breaks increase vigour and concentration and decrease fatigue immediately after the break

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Compared to no break, self-reported vigour and concentration increased and fatigue decreased significantly immediately following an active movement break, with improvements sustained for 20 minutes. → Lynch Julia 2022

Evidence

Lynch Julia 2022

Lynch Julia, O'Donoghue Gráinne, Peiris Casey L. (2022). Classroom Movement Breaks and Physically Active Learning Are Feasible, Reduce Sedentary Behaviour and Fatigue, and May Increase Focus in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137775

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Single-group intervention–control study (Blasche et al., n = 66) comparing 6 min unstructured, exercise, or relaxation breaks after 45 min of a 2 h lecture against no break, using a wellbeing questionnaire on fatigue and vigour. Fatigue decrease significant at p < 0.01; no effect size printed.

"Compared to no break, self-reported vigour and concentration were increased, and fatigue decreased significantly (p < 0.01) immediately following an active CMB with improvements sustained for 20 min following the break in a single-group intervention–control study"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.