Claims

Community nurse training programs improve nurses' knowledge, with significantly different effect sizes across hybrid, online and onsite delivery subgroups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? CNTPs improved nurses' knowledge via hybrid (SMD = 0.15–2.21), online (SMD = 0.12–0.29) and onsite (SMD = −0.51 to 0.11) methods, with effect sizes differing significantly across subgroups. → Pumsopa 2025

Evidence

Pumsopa 2025

Pumsopa, N., Jirapongsuwan, A., Kalampakorn, S., Siri, S., and Klainin‐Yobas, P. (2025). The Effectiveness of Community Nurse Training Programs to Improve Nurses' Competency in Community Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.70090

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta‐analysis of 10 studies (16 comparisons; 1437 participants) found effect sizes differed significantly across delivery subgroups (Chi2 = 36.42, p < 0.001), with "The hybrid subgroup effect sizes ranged from 0.21 to 2.21" and "no effects of the onsite subgroup were observed".

"The analysis revealed that community nurse training programs improved nurses' knowledge via hybrid pedagogical (SMD = 0.15–2.21), online (SMD = 0.12–0.29) and onsite methods (SMD = −0.51 to 0.11)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.