Claims

Knowledge outcomes do not differ between immediate post‐intervention and follow‐up for online or hybrid training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No significant difference in nurses' knowledge was found between post‐intervention and follow‐up subgroups for online training (Chi2 = 0.02, p = 0.880) or hybrid training (Chi2 = 0.43, p = 0.510). → Pumsopa 2025

Evidence

Pumsopa 2025

Pumsopa, N., Jirapongsuwan, A., Kalampakorn, S., Siri, S., and Klainin‐Yobas, P. (2025). The Effectiveness of Community Nurse Training Programs to Improve Nurses' Competency in Community Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.70090

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup analysis of assessment points for knowledge outcomes found no significant differences for either online or hybrid training subgroups; equivalence was not tested.

"For online training (one study, four comparisons), no significant difference in nurses' knowledge was found between the post‐intervention and follow‐up subgroups (Chi2 = 0.02, p = 0.880; Figure 5). Similarly, for hybrid training, the difference in knowledge outcomes between the two assessment points was also not significant (Chi2 = 0.43, p = 0.510; Figure 6)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.