A student-staff co-creation initiative explored generative AI technologies in the context of higher education assessments¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q1
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? A co-creation initiative explored the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the context of higher education assessments. → Williams 2025
Evidence¶
Williams 2025¶
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025). Assessment design through co-creation: Student-staff partnership in evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence. International Journal for Students as Partners, 9(1), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802
q1 · i? · qualitative · r?
The article's abstract reports a co-creation initiative that "explored the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the context of higher education assessments". Qualitative case study; no effect sizes are reported.
"This case study reports on a co-creation initiative that explored the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the context of higher education assessments."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The value of the student-staff collaboration was explored from student, staff, and institutional perspectives, with benefits, limitations, and recommendations presented — related
- Students and staff co-designed evaluation criteria, and resultant challenges were explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis — related
- A student-staff partnership evaluated ChatGPT-generated output in response to diverse coursework assessments on an undergraduate medical sciences programme — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- AI adoption in higher education is associated with improved teaching practices, learner engagement and curriculum innovation — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
co-creation-initiative-explored-generative-ai-assessments |
title |
A student-staff co-creation initiative explored generative AI technologies in the context of higher education assessments |
description |
A student-staff co-creation initiative explored generative AI technologies in the context of higher education assessments |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — williams-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.