Students and staff co-designed evaluation criteria, and resultant challenges were explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q1
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Evaluation criteria were co-designed by students and staff, and resultant challenges faced by students and staff were explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis. → Williams 2025
Evidence¶
Williams 2025¶
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025). Assessment design through co-creation: Student-staff partnership in evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence. International Journal for Students as Partners, 9(1), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802
q1 · i? · qualitative · r2
The abstract states that the co-design of evaluation criteria and key findings are presented, and that challenges "are explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis". Qualitative case study; no effect sizes are reported.
"The co-design of evaluation criteria and key findings are presented and resultant challenges faced by students and staff are explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A student-staff co-creation initiative explored generative AI technologies in the context of higher education assessments — related
- A formative study with 12 clinical-year medical students produced four design-oriented themes for AI-SP consultation practice — related
- Students perceived AIvaluate assessments as reducing social pressure and offering flexible pacing and ease of use, but noted technical challenges and lack of dynamic human interaction — related
- Core Teams identified communication challenges, school and district leadership turnover, and teacher burnout as barriers that influenced solution success — related
- The value of the student-staff collaboration was explored from student, staff, and institutional perspectives, with benefits, limitations, and recommendations presented — related
- After-school setting offered richer activity diversity, dialogue, and peer interaction than regular classrooms — related
- A student-staff partnership evaluated ChatGPT-generated output in response to diverse coursework assessments on an undergraduate medical sciences programme — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
co-designed-evaluation-criteria-challenges-thematic-analysis |
title |
Students and staff co-designed evaluation criteria, and resultant challenges were explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis |
description |
Students and staff co-designed evaluation criteria, and resultant challenges were explored through dialogue, interview, and thematic analysis |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — williams-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.