Facilitators reported that co-regulation strategies strengthened their facilitation and made their interactions with youth more intentional¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Facilitators reported the strategies strengthened facilitation, connection with students, and program environment. → Tingey 2023 q2 i? Facilitators reported the strategies helped them be more intentional about when and how they interacted with youth. → Tingey 2023 (2)

Evidence¶

Tingey 2023¶

Tingey, L., R. Piatt, A. Hennigar, C. O'Callahan, S. Weaver, and H. Zaveri. (2023). The Sexual Risk Avoidance Education National Evaluation: Using Co-regulation in Youth Programs. OPRE Report 2023-281, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre

q2 · i? · design · r2

Executive summary synthesis of facilitator surveys, interviews, and logs across nine sites in 2022-2023; this is the facilitators' own perception, "facilitators thought using the strategies strengthened their facilitation", not a tested outcome comparison.

"Overall, facilitators thought using the strategies strengthened their facilitation, improved their ability to connect with students, and helped them build a positive program environment."

Tingey 2023 (2)¶

Tingey, L., R. Piatt, A. Hennigar, C. O'Callahan, S. Weaver, and H. Zaveri. (2023). The Sexual Risk Avoidance Education National Evaluation: Using Co-regulation in Youth Programs. OPRE Report 2023-281, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre

q2 · i? · design · r2

Section II.C reports facilitator interview and survey accounts that the strategies increased intentionality, for example shifting from generic praise to praise that is personal and specific.

"Facilitators reported that the co-regulation strategies helped them be more intentional about when and how they interacted with youth."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Using co-regulation strategies helped facilitators and youth build warm, trusting relationships — related
• Implementation of co-regulation strategies was shaped by classroom context, facilitator experience and mindset, and varied in ease across strategies — related
• Co-regulation strategies were reported to create a safe, positive classroom climate and to help youth manage emotions — related
• Trusting teacher-evaluator relationships lessened evaluation anxiety and encouraged teachers to welcome and use REACH feedback — related