Co-regulation strategies were reported to create a safe, positive classroom climate and to help youth manage emotions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 6 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Facilitators described the strategies as helping create an environment where youth felt safe expressing themselves and asking questions. → Tingey 2023
q2 i? Youth reported that interactions with facilitators, especially breath to focus, helped them manage high emotions. → Tingey 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Tingey 2023¶
Tingey, L., R. Piatt, A. Hennigar, C. O'Callahan, S. Weaver, and H. Zaveri. (2023). The Sexual Risk Avoidance Education National Evaluation: Using Co-regulation in Youth Programs. OPRE Report 2023-281, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre
q2 · i? · design · r2
Section II.C qualitative findings; youth focus groups similarly described the classroom as "safe" and "a positive space", and facilitators credited breath to focus with setting the tone of the class.
"Facilitators described how the strategies helped them create a positive environment where youth felt safe expressing themselves, asking questions, and being open."
Tingey 2023 (2)¶
Tingey, L., R. Piatt, A. Hennigar, C. O'Callahan, S. Weaver, and H. Zaveri. (2023). The Sexual Risk Avoidance Education National Evaluation: Using Co-regulation in Youth Programs. OPRE Report 2023-281, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre
q2 · i? · design · r2
Youth focus group accounts in Section II.C; one student said breath to focus helps "to not get mad" and another described using the taught tools to reflect on emotions in the future.
"Many youth also talked about how their interactions with facilitators helped them manage situations when emotions were high."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Affect Regulation — outcome: instruction changes it
- Executive Function — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
-
SEL programs improve social emotional skills — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
The evidence base for school mindfulness interventions is promising but too variable for definitive practice recommendations — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- A non-peer-reviewed web essay asserts, citing an earlier source second-hand, that behaviorist reinforcement methods are very effective in creating positive behavior in almost any learning environment — related
- Using co-regulation strategies helped facilitators and youth build warm, trusting relationships — related
- Implementation of co-regulation strategies was shaped by classroom context, facilitator experience and mindset, and varied in ease across strategies — related
- Facilitators reported that co-regulation strategies strengthened their facilitation and made their interactions with youth more intentional — related
- Honours community members perceive a safe and supportive environment that facilitates exploring new ideas — related
- Attending to affect in co-design supports community formation and cross-scale transfer — related
- Universal school-based SEL programs improve students' behaviour, with a small and, in recent randomised trials, negligible effect on academic achievement — a broader claim this one bears on
- Schools where students report feeling more safe, supported, and challenged show stronger academic and social-emotional growth, and student reports predict future school improvement — related
- Classrooms in high-performing CHSRI schools showed positive, mutually respectful student-teacher relationships with emotional and academic support — related
- Best leverage points for improving performance lie in teacher strategies for classroom context, mindsets, and learning strategies — related
- Positive classroom climate is associated with more frequent socially shared regulation of learning — related
- Teacher support is one of the strongest predictors of student belonging — related
- Youth designers specified norm setting and flexibility as key components of the Tech Talk game instructions — related
- Exposure to the HP Learning Studio raised student awareness that spread peer-to-peer and broadened students' sense of future possibilities — related
- Participants reported that the trust-building collaborative environment enabled open and vulnerable sharing — related
- Trauma-informed practices such as safe environments and positive relationships can mitigate the effects of trauma and promote resilience — a broader claim this one bears on
- Cognitive, emotional, and social skills should be taught alongside content because learning is integrated in the brain — related
- School designs supporting caring, continuous student-teacher relationships better address trauma and strengthen achievement than traditional factory-model schools — related
- Strong relationships and supportive conditions can offset the effects of trauma on learning and behavior — related
- Youth reported positive perceived impacts on healthy relationships (77 percent) and on self-regulation and decision-making (62–66 percent) — related
- In the tested structural model, contextual support positively predicts trust calibration and collaborative regulation, trust calibration positively predicts collaborative regulation and perceived transfer gains, and collaborative regulation shows the strongest association with perceived transfer gains — related
- For some students, AI-generated feedback reduces the perceived personal risk of exposing weaknesses, functioning as a psychologically safe space for feedback seeking — related
- Inviting students to share everyday experiences contributed to a safe, inclusive classroom climate in which students willingly shared personal experiences in life skills conversations. — related
- Students perceive a low-stress climate—supportive teacher behavior and an undistressed social environment—as a critical condition for fun in learning — related
- Antecedent-focused emotion regulation strategies are linked to higher-quality teacher-student interactions and better classroom management — related
- Positive school-based relationships support secondary students' learning and well-being, especially for youth experiencing poverty, trauma, and discrimination — related
- Most participating youth reported positive perceptions of Project With implementation, including 85 percent feeling respected all or most of the time — related
- The report claims six core SoLD findings should reshape teacher preparation, including that the brain is malleable, variability is the norm, and relationships catalyze learning — related
- Educator social-emotional competency and wellbeing contribute to warm student-teacher relationships and to trusted adults who model stress management for students — related
- Utah Schools for the Deaf and Blind adapted the Resilience, Rights & Respectful Relationships curriculum for intentional, direct SEL instruction with deaf students — related
- Teachers promoted inclusive classroom environments by organizing time and space and fostering peer inclusion — related
- Qualitative studies depict teachers as emotional socialisers whose modelling, warmth, and structure are perceived to foster students' SEC and classroom engagement — related
- Classroom-level teacher structure is linked with students' behavioral, cognitive and emotional engagement in language classes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
co-regulation-supports-climate-and-youth-emotion-regulation |
title |
Co-regulation strategies were reported to create a safe, positive classroom climate and to help youth manage emotions |
description |
Co-regulation strategies were reported to create a safe, positive classroom climate and to help youth manage emotions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — tingey-2023, tingey-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.