Coaching-method students mentioned more artists at least once and mentioned artists more repeatedly than control students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental group mentioned 43 artists at least once versus 26 in the control group, and 75 artists were mentioned 2-3 times in the experimental group versus 27 in the control group. → Faizrakhmanova 2018

Evidence¶

Faizrakhmanova 2018¶

Faizrakhmanova, A., Averianova, T., Aitov, V., Gibatova, G., & Lebedeva, I. (2018). Coaching Method in Teaching History of Visual Arts to Students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 80-88. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181965

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Survey of students' questionnaires in the same Kazan Federal University quasi-experiment. The text reports 63 artists mentioned at least once in the experimental group, "twice as many as in the control group", with Leonardo da Vinci mentioned 135 times by 100% of students. Table 2 prints 43 vs 26 for this parameter and 75 vs 27 for mentions 2-3 times.

"In the experimental group, 63 artists were mentioned at least once (twice as many as in the control group). The number of times Leonardo da Vinci was mentioned is 135 (100% students)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The distribution of artists named per student shifts upward under coaching-method instruction (highest 22 vs 15; lowest 9-10 vs 4-5) — related
• Coaching-method instruction roughly doubles the average number of artists students can name in History of Visual Arts (15.5 vs 7.8 per student) — related