The distribution of artists named per student shifts upward under coaching-method instruction (highest 22 vs 15; lowest 9-10 vs 4-5)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The highest number of artists mentioned by one student was 22 in the experimental group versus 15 in the control group, and the lowest was 9-10 versus 4-5. → Faizrakhmanova 2018

Evidence¶

Faizrakhmanova 2018¶

Faizrakhmanova, A., Averianova, T., Aitov, V., Gibatova, G., & Lebedeva, I. (2018). Coaching Method in Teaching History of Visual Arts to Students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 80-88. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181965

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Survey results (Table 1, Figure 1) from the Kazan Federal University quasi-experiment. The experimental group's highest value was 22, given by twenty-one students (15%); the control group's highest was 15, given by eleven students (4.8%). The experimental group's lowest value of 9-10 artists matches the control group's average.

"In the experimental group, the highest number of artists mentioned by one student is 22 (in twenty-one students' responses, which amounts to 15% of the total number of students in the experimental group)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Coaching-method students mentioned more artists at least once and mentioned artists more repeatedly than control students — related
• Coaching-method instruction roughly doubles the average number of artists students can name in History of Visual Arts (15.5 vs 7.8 per student) — related