Claims

Teachers who report coaching as a partnership report more improvement in classroom challenges and higher technology-use confidence; voluntary participation and non-evaluative support correlate with improvement in classroom challenges

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers reporting coaching as a partnership showed positive significant correlations with ITU confidence (corr between .16 and .21) and challenge improvement (corr for index score = .43, p < .001). → Mahsa Bakhshaei 2020 q2 i? Voluntary participation (corr = .36) and non-evaluative support (corr = 0.3) each correlated positively with improvement in classroom challenges (p < .001). → Mahsa Bakhshaei 2020 (2)

Evidence

Mahsa Bakhshaei 2020

Mahsa Bakhshaei, Angela Hardy, Jason Ravitz, John Seylar. (2020). Instructional Coaching Holds Promise as a Method to Improve Instruction with Technology. SITE 2020 - Online, April 7-10, 2020. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/5465e54a-b290-4210-97fb-514a3aa13e21

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Correlational analyses of DLP year 2 teacher survey data linking partnership perceptions to ITU confidence ("corr between .16 and .21, p < .001") and to challenge improvement ("corr for index score = .43, p < .001"). The article prints correlations but not in a standardized metric the coding rules accept, so impact is left uncoded.

"Correlation analyses show a positive significant relationship between teachers reporting coaching as a partnership and their confidence in the six areas of their ITU ability (corr between .16 and .21, p < .001) as well as their average improvement in their selected classroom challenge(s), such as assessment or differentiation (corr for index score = .43, p < .001)."

Mahsa Bakhshaei 2020 (2)

Mahsa Bakhshaei, Angela Hardy, Jason Ravitz, John Seylar. (2020). Instructional Coaching Holds Promise as a Method to Improve Instruction with Technology. SITE 2020 - Online, April 7-10, 2020. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/5465e54a-b290-4210-97fb-514a3aa13e21

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Survey correlations from the DLP: voluntary participation with a printed "corr with improvement in classroom challenges = .36, p < .001" and non-evaluative support with "corr with improvement in classroom challenges = 0.3, p < .001 ", as printed; no further standardized effect size is given.

"The most important conditions seem to be that teacher participation is voluntary (corr with improvement in classroom challenges = .36, p < .001) and that teachers receive support from a coach in a non-evaluative manner (corr with improvement in classroom challenges = 0.3, p < .001 )."

Studies bearing on this claim

Does participation that is voluntary and kept apart from evaluation go with more change in practice? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 2 narrower claims that bear on it: 3 distinct studies (2 qualitative, 1 associational), q1–q2, 0 of 3 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Mahsa Bakhshaei 2020 q2 · associational · r1 i? this claim
Hardy 2021 q2 · qualitative · r? i? When district administration encourages a culture of coaching, teachers feel more comforta (supports)
Susan E. Sporte 2013 q1 · qualitative · r2 i? Administrators' dual role as evaluator and coach can undermine the observation process's p (supports)

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id coaching-partnership-voluntary-non-evaluative
title Teachers who report coaching as a partnership report more improvement in classroom challenges and higher technology-use confidence; voluntary participation and non-evaluative support correlate with improvement in classroom challenges
description Teachers who report coaching as a partnership report more improvement in classroom challenges and higher technology-use confidence; voluntary participation and non-evaluative support correlate with improvement in classroom challenges (survey correlations, which cannot show cause)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — mahsa-bakhshaei-2020, mahsa-bakhshaei-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.