Claims

Cognitive abilities show the strongest correlation with academic achievement among the student-characteristic domains examined

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Mean effect sizes differ significantly by student-characteristic type (Q = 14.56; p < 0.01), with cognitive ability highest (r = 0.29) and positive personality lowest (r = 0.20). → Erdem Cahit 2026

Evidence

Erdem Cahit 2026

Erdem Cahit, Kaya Metin, Polat Mustafa, Eğmir Eray. (2026). Thinking and feeling matter: a second-order meta-analysis of student characteristics across developmental domains and their effect on academic outcomes. BMC Psychology, 14, 919. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05035-x

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis comparing four characteristic domains across 71 effect sizes: cognitive ability (k = 22, r = 0.29), positive emotions (k = 30, r = 0.25), positive personality (k = 13, r = 0.20), and psychomotor (k = 6, r = 0.37). The discussion reports cognitive abilities account for "approximately 8.4% of the variance in academic achievement".

"The mean effect sizes differed significantly in terms of student characteristics type (Q = 14.56; p < 0.01). The relationship between cognitive ability and academic achievement had higher effect size values (r = 0.29)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.