Claims

The revised questionnaire shows satisfactory internal consistencies for each cognitive load type across Studies 1 and 2

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In Study 1, McDonald's omega reached ωICL = 0.93, ωECL = 0.91, and ωGCL = 0.88 for the three load-type scales. → Krieglstein 2023 q2 i? In Study 2, internal consistency of the three factors was assessed as good to very good (ωICL = 0.93; ωECL = 0.93; ωGCL = 0.80). → Krieglstein 2023 (2)

Evidence

Krieglstein 2023

Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023). Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Questionnaire to Measure Different Types of Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0

q2 · i? · design · r3

Reliability analysis within the Study 1 PCA (n = 69) after item reduction. The article reports "Internal consistencies were satisfactory across the cog- nitive load types" with the printed omega values for each scale.

"Internal consistencies were satisfactory across the cog- nitive load types ( ωICL = 0.93; ωECL = 0.91; ωGCL = 0.88). U nsurprisingly, the overall reliability of ω = 0.61 was rather low"

Krieglstein 2023 (2)

Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023). Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Questionnaire to Measure Different Types of Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0

q2 · i? · design · r3

Reliability analysis within the Study 2 confirmatory factor analysis (n = 158 Prolific participants rating a nerve-cell material). The article reports the three factors' internal consistency as "good to very good" with the printed omega values.

"In addition, the internal consistency of the three factors (respectively cognitive load types) can be assessed as good to very good ( ωICL = 0.93; ωECL = 0.93; ωGCL = 0.80)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cognitive-load-questionnaire-satisfactory-internal-consistencies
title The revised questionnaire shows satisfactory internal consistencies for each cognitive load type across Studies 1 and 2
description The revised questionnaire shows satisfactory internal consistencies for each cognitive load type across Studies 1 and 2
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — krieglstein-2023, krieglstein-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.