The revised questionnaire shows satisfactory internal consistencies for each cognitive load type across Studies 1 and 2¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In Study 1, McDonald's omega reached ωICL = 0.93, ωECL = 0.91, and ωGCL = 0.88 for the three load-type scales. → Krieglstein 2023
q2 i? In Study 2, internal consistency of the three factors was assessed as good to very good (ωICL = 0.93; ωECL = 0.93; ωGCL = 0.80). → Krieglstein 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Krieglstein 2023¶
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023). Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Questionnaire to Measure Different Types of Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0
q2 · i? · design · r3
Reliability analysis within the Study 1 PCA (n = 69) after item reduction. The article reports "Internal consistencies were satisfactory across the cog- nitive load types" with the printed omega values for each scale.
"Internal consistencies were satisfactory across the cog- nitive load types ( ωICL = 0.93; ωECL = 0.91; ωGCL = 0.88). U nsurprisingly, the overall reliability of ω = 0.61 was rather low"
Krieglstein 2023 (2)¶
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023). Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Questionnaire to Measure Different Types of Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0
q2 · i? · design · r3
Reliability analysis within the Study 2 confirmatory factor analysis (n = 158 Prolific participants rating a nerve-cell material). The article reports the three factors' internal consistency as "good to very good" with the printed omega values.
"In addition, the internal consistency of the three factors (respectively cognitive load types) can be assessed as good to very good ( ωICL = 0.93; ωECL = 0.93; ωGCL = 0.80)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Subjective cognitive load questionnaires show satisfactory internal consistency across the four most frequently used instruments in experimental multimedia learning research — a broader claim this one bears on
- A confirmatory factor analysis on a new sample confirms the three-factor structure with acceptable model fit and moderate convergent validity — related
- The GAA-LS shows satisfactory-to-strong internal consistency and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity — related
- Across three experiments (Studies 3–5), the questionnaire was shown to be sensitive to changes in cognitive load, supporting its predictive validity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cognitive-load-questionnaire-satisfactory-internal-consistencies |
title |
The revised questionnaire shows satisfactory internal consistencies for each cognitive load type across Studies 1 and 2 |
description |
The revised questionnaire shows satisfactory internal consistencies for each cognitive load type across Studies 1 and 2 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — krieglstein-2023, krieglstein-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.