The GAA-LS shows satisfactory-to-strong internal consistency and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Cronbach's alpha ranged from .83 to .88 across subscales and was .93 for the total scale, with AVE values from .60 to .66 and HTMT values from .54 to .76 supporting convergent and discriminant validity. → Nie J 2026

Evidence¶

Nie J 2026¶

Nie J, Zhang Z, Lu X, Zhang Y and Zhang M (2026) Development and validation of the generative AI assessment literacy scale for higher education students: psychometric evidence and associations with feedback engagement and academic integrity. Front. Educ. 11:1934632. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1934632

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Study 2 reliability and validity analysis. "AVE values ranged from .60 to .66, supporting convergent validity", and HTMT values ranged from .54 to .76, below the .85 threshold; factor correlations ranged from .46 to .63.

"Cronbach’s alpha ranged from .83 to .88 across the five subscales and was .93 for the total scale. McDonald’s omega ranged from .84 to .88 across subscales and was .94 for the total scale."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• GAA-LS scores correlate positively with feedback engagement, academic integrity intention, and responsible AI use intention, and differ across known groups — related
• Feedback engagement indirectly associates GAA-LS scores with academic integrity intention in a cross-sectional structural model — related
• Exploratory factor analysis supports a five-factor GAA-LS structure explaining 67.82% of variance — related
• Questionnaire constructs showed acceptable to strong internal consistency (α = 0.740 to 0.945) — related
• The survey instrument's nine constructs show convergent and discriminant validity in this sample — related
• The GenAI-SRL scale shows satisfactory reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity across its six dimensions — related
• The ten-construct instrument showed strong psychometric quality, with the four ARCS dimensions forming a psychometrically sound higher-order motivation construct — related
• Existing online SRL questionnaires show reliability problems, with most having at least one scale outside the acceptable Cronbach's alpha range — related
• SFAILQ shows high reliability, convergent validity with digital literacy (r = 0.49–0.68), and discriminant validity (HTMT below 0.80) — related
• The SKT-SRL shows acceptable-to-very good internal consistency across subscales — related
• The five-dimension structure and scale were validated with 308 graduate students, showing acceptable reliability and validity — related
• The revised questionnaire shows satisfactory internal consistencies for each cognitive load type across Studies 1 and 2 — related