Claims

Collaboration quality, information quality, and user satisfaction predict e-learning use

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Collaboration quality positively influences use of e-learning systems (β=0.370, p<0.001). → Cidral 2018 q2 i? Information quality positively influences use (β=0.189, p<0.050). → Cidral 2018 q2 i? User perceived satisfaction positively influences use (β=0.150, p<0.010). → Cidral 2018

Evidence

Cidral 2018

Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M. & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers and Education, 122, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Survey of 301 valid responses from Brazilian higher education students analyzed with PLS structural equation modeling using 5,000 bootstrap resamples; the model "explains 32.2% of the e-learning use variation" with the three significant paths reported.

"The model explains 32.2% of the e-learning use variation. Collaboration quality (β=0.370; p<0.001), information quality (β=0.189; p<0.050), and user perceived satisfaction (β=0.150; p<0.010) are statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.