The editors report that knowledge brokering via collaborative entanglement is more successful than linear knowledge transfer for mobilising education research¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The editorial reports, citing knowledge mobilisation research, that linear knowledge transfer (e.g. research publications tailored to practitioners) has proven successful only for bounded problems, while forms of collaborative entanglement such as co-design are more successful for mobilising knowledge. → Michael J. Baker 2024

Evidence¶

Michael J. Baker 2024¶

Michael J. Baker, Peter Reimann. (2024). CSCL has come of age. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn (2024) 19:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09419-2

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The editorial's connection-to-practice section reports this conclusion, attributed by the authors to Mosher et al. (2014) and knowledge brokering research (Levin, 2011; Rycroft-Smith, 2022); the editorial presents no data of its own. It highlights "collaborative entanglement" as the more successful route.

"Linear knowledge transfer (such as research publications tailored to practitioners) has proven successful only for bounded problems with relatively clear solutions. More successful for mobilising knowledge are forms of "collaborative entanglement" (Mosher et al., 2014)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The editorial reports that successful collaborative making teams resolved coordination challenges through intertwined social-discursive and materially mediated processes — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• CSCL relations matter in two ways: interventions informed by empirical studies can support collaboration, and CSCL environments can foster key competencies — related