The editorial reports that successful collaborative making teams resolved coordination challenges through intertwined social-discursive and materially mediated processes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The editorial reports that analysis of seventh-grade teams' collaborative co-invention in maker spaces illustrated how successful teams sorted out coordination challenges, with social-discursive and materially mediated aspects of making intertwined. → Carolyn P. Rosé & Sanna Järvelä 2020
Evidence¶
Carolyn P. Rosé & Sanna Järvelä 2020¶
Carolyn P. Rosé & Sanna Järvelä. (2020). Building community together: towards equitable CSCL practices and processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09329-z
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
The editorial describes Riikonen, Seitamaa-Hakkarainen and Hakkarainen's qualitative study of seventh-grade student teams' collaborative making, whose methods provide "visibility into this entanglement" of social-discursive and material processes, illustrating how successful teams resolved coordination challenges. Reported second-hand; no effect sizes printed.
"By providing visibility into this entanglement, the analysis is able to illustrate how successful teams were able to sort out their coordination challenges during the co-invention process."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The editors report that knowledge brokering via collaborative entanglement is more successful than linear knowledge transfer for mobilising education research — a broader claim this one bears on
- Successful seventh-grade co-invention teams spent a much larger share of their embodied making actions on model making and experimenting than the unsuccessful team — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Anchoring collaboration in a shared epistemic object distinguished the successful co-invention teams from the unsuccessful one — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A shared epistemic object let a team with substantial off-task time (UrPo) still complete a successful co-invention — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Embodied design practices of sketching and experimenting co-occurred with the application of product design, computer engineering, and science practices, while model making was more often followed by it — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Off-task activity appeared more common in the larger six-to-seven-member teams than in the compact teams, though not in every larger team — related
- Much bodily-material coordination in touchscreen collaboration occurs in the space off the screen — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
making-team-success-coordination-entanglement |
title |
The editorial reports that successful collaborative making teams resolved coordination challenges through intertwined social-discursive and materially mediated processes |
description |
The editorial reports that successful collaborative making teams resolved coordination challenges through intertwined social-discursive and materially mediated processes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — carolyn-p-rosé-sanna-järvelä-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.