Claims

Collaborative learning did not appear to sustain trainees' motivation in the online programme

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The category learning online with others (M 66) did not rank among the highest-impact factors, and interviews showed scepticism about forums and group work. → Banegas 2014

Evidence

Banegas 2014

Banegas, D.L., & Manzur Busleimán, G. (2014). Motivating factors in online language teacher education in southern Argentina. Computers & Education, 76, 131–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.014

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Mixed survey and interview findings: the learning online with others category scored lower than autonomy and course status, and nine interviewees viewed forums as demotivating. The authors attribute this partly to "participants‟ poor assessment of forums and other LMS features."

"collaborative learning as reflected in “learning online with others” category did not appear to sustain participants‟ motivation. This may be explained by participants‟ poor assessment of forums and other LMS features and tools which should promote and facilitate collaborative learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.