Collaborative writing develops through distinct phases, is non-linear and non-cumulative, with sharing of opinions emerging in the last phase¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Kimmerle et al.'s multi-method analysis shows students' collaborative writing develops through different phases, and the sharing of opinions seems to develop in the last phase of the work. → Ludvigsen 2017 q2 i? The collaborative writing is non-linear and non-cumulative across phases; the solution emerges towards the end of the process. → Ludvigsen 2017 (2)

Evidence¶

Ludvigsen 2017¶

Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., Rosé, C. P., & Stahl, G. (2017). Frameworks for mass collaboration, adaptable scripts, complex systems theory, and collaborative writing. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn, 12, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9257-7

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The editorial reports the Kimmerle, Moskaliuk, Brendle, and Cress study, in secondary-school students writing about media and violence in dyads using Etherpad under a jigsaw paradigm with two tasks of approximately 90 min each. It is the editorial's summary of the en本文, citing the study's analysis.

"The analysis shows that the student’s writing develops through different phases and that the sharing of opinions seems to develop in the last phase of the work."

Ludvigsen 2017 (2)¶

Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., Rosé, C. P., & Stahl, G. (2017). Frameworks for mass collaboration, adaptable scripts, complex systems theory, and collaborative writing. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn, 12, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9257-7

q2 · i? · review · r1

The editorial summarizes the process findings of the same collaborative-writing study, where writing was the only mode of communication and dyad members began with different theoretical perspectives (learning theories versus arousal theories).

"The collaborative writing is non-linear and non-cumulative through the different phases. The social and cognitive demands that are part of the task emerge through interactions, and the solution comes towards the end of the process."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In a synchronous online environment, self-organization can be seen as a continuum, and there is strong interdependence between processes and content
• All teams showed divergent-then-convergent idea improvement patterns across prototyping sessions
• AI literacy priorities manifest as developmentally distinct pedagogical patterns across educational phases — related
• Becoming knowledge-creating learners requires developing specific metaskills — related