Error correction feedback produces significant gains across all six collocation categories at advanced and intermediate levels but none at the elementary level¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study ·q2quasi-experiment
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? All six collocation categories (Adj.+Prep., N+Prep., V+Prep., V+N, Adj.+N, N+N) showed significant improvement at advanced and intermediate levels (p<0.05) but not at the elementary level (p>0.05). → Jafarpour 2012
q2 i? Error correction feedback had a significant positive effect on collocation competence at advanced and intermediate levels (p<0.05) but not at the elementary level (p>0.05). → Jafarpour 2012
Evidence¶
Jafarpour 2012¶
Jafarpour, A. A., & Sharifi, A. (2012). The effect of error correction feedback on the collocation competence of Iranian EFL learners. Teaching English with Technology, 12(3), 3-17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1144965
q2 · i?
Category-level analysis of pretest-posttest score differences in the experimental group across six collocation categories at three proficiency levels. At the advanced level, significance values ranged from 0.005 to 0.032; at the intermediate level all categories showed p=0.000; at the elementary level p values ranged from 0.41 to 0.48, none significant.
"A significant relation was observed after intervention in all categories at advanced and intermediate levels (p<0.05). Table 4 shows these results."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Adj.+N is the collocation category with the highest error correction feedback gain at the advanced level — related
- Error correction feedback is more effective for grammatical collocations than lexical collocations at intermediate and elementary levels — related
- Written corrective feedback reduces grammatical errors in EFL post-test writing — related
- Analogy-based corrective feedback produced higher grammar posttest scores than metalinguistic feedback among young elementary EFL learners — related
- L2 proficiency level is a significant moderator: multiple glosses benefit intermediate and advanced learners more than elementary learners — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
aliases |
error-correction-feedback-improves-collocation-competence-intermediate-advanced |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.