Claims

The argument that excluding demographic predictors amounts to color-blind racism is contested: inclusion can also produce racist decision-making

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoretical r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Yu et al. (2021) and others argue that excluding protected attributes from dropout prediction models can be construed as subscribing to a colorblind ideology criticized as racist. → Baker 2023 q1 i? The authors argue demographic predictor variables may instead be interpreted through cultural racism and minimization-of-racism frames, attributing outcomes to immutable factors. → Baker 2023 (2)

Evidence

Baker 2023

Baker, R. S., Esbenshade, L., Vitale, J., & Karumbaiah, S. (2023). Using Demographic Data as Predictor Variables: a Questionable Choice. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 15(2). https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM/article/view/619 doi:10.35542/osf.io/y4wvj

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

The article quotes Yu et al. (2021, p. 98) arguing that "the deliberate exclusion of protected attributes" can be construed as colorblind ideology; it notes the same claim appears in Andrus & Villaneueve (2022) and Schwobel & Remmers (2022).

"the deliberate exclusion of protected attributes from dropout prediction models can be construed as subscribing to a 'colorblind' ideology, which has been criticized as a racist approach that serves to maintain the status quo."

Baker 2023 (2)

Baker, R. S., Esbenshade, L., Vitale, J., & Karumbaiah, S. (2023). Using Demographic Data as Predictor Variables: a Questionable Choice. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 15(2). https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM/article/view/619. doi:10.35542/osf.io/y4wvj

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

The authors' counter-argument (type e): given widespread implicit color-blind racism, "demographic predictor variables may be inte rpreted in accordance with Bonilla-Silva’s cultural racism and minimization of racism frames", communicating that a student is at risk due to immutable factors beyond school control, so actual racist practices are overlooked.

"Instead, demographic predictor variables may be inte rpreted in accordance with Bonilla-Silva’s cultural racism and minimization of racism frames."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id colorblind-racism-argument-for-inclusion-contested
title The argument that excluding demographic predictors amounts to color-blind racism is contested: inclusion can also produce racist decision-making
description The argument that excluding demographic predictors amounts to color-blind racism is contested: inclusion can also produce racist decision-making
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — baker-2023, baker-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.