Claims

Combining real and virtual laboratories outperforms either single modality in physics learning outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Real–virtual laboratory combinations produced the most consistent, superior conceptual gains relative to single-modality instruction. → Yahya Fahmi 2026

Evidence

Yahya Fahmi 2026

Yahya Fahmi, Rusijono Rusijono, Dewi Utari, Metafisika Kartika, Lestiani Winda, Hermansyah Hermansyah, Asbanu Dens E. S. I. (2026). Bridging Pedagogy and Technology: A Systematic Literature Review on Inquiry-Collaborative Models Assisted with Virtual Laboratory in Physics Education. F1000Research 15:1682. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.191181.1

q3 · i? · review · r2

Narrative thematic synthesis of the review corpus (21 reports, 20 studies supporting this theme). The review reports that real-virtual combinations were superior, with Flegr et al. (2023b) showing "real and virtual experiments together outperform real experiments alone among 202 secondary students".

"When modalities are combined, the direction becomes far more consistent. Flegr et al. (2023b) showed that real and virtual experiments together outperform real experiments alone among 202 secondary students"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.