Claims

Affective outcomes of virtual-laboratory modalities are divided and interact with learners' initial attitude profiles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Video-recorded experiments placed students in worry and anxiety zones more often than physical apparatus, and initial attitude profiles interacted significantly with conceptual gains from immersive VR. → Yahya Fahmi 2026

Evidence

Yahya Fahmi 2026

Yahya Fahmi, Rusijono Rusijono, Dewi Utari, Metafisika Kartika, Lestiani Winda, Hermansyah Hermansyah, Asbanu Dens E. S. I. (2026). Bridging Pedagogy and Technology: A Systematic Literature Review on Inquiry-Collaborative Models Assisted with Virtual Laboratory in Physics Education. F1000Research 15:1682. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.191181.1

q3 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis of the divided affective findings. The review also reports Tsivitanidou et al. (2021) found a "significant interaction between conceptual gains and learners' pre-existing attitudinal profiles", while other studies reported positive motivation and creativity effects.

"Karelina et al. (2022) found that students working with video-recorded experiments occupy the worry and anxiety zones of a flow model more often than students using physical apparatus"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.