Claims

Combining analogy-based simulation with laboratory activities produces significantly higher corrected post-test achievement in simple electricity than either environment alone

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Seventh-graders taught with both analogy-based simulation and laboratory activities scored significantly higher on corrected EPT post-tests than students taught with laboratory activities alone or simulation alone. → Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü & İbilge Dökme 2011

Evidence

Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü & İbilge Dökme 2011

Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü & İbilge Dökme. (2011). The effect of combining analogy-based simulation and laboratory activities on Turkish elementary school students' understanding of simple electric circuits. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojet

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental study of 66 seventh-graders randomly assigned to three groups; ANCOVA on corrected EPT post-tests with Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons favored the combined group, "in favor of the experimental group". Table 8 reports corrected means of 15.38 (combined, n=27), 12.41 (laboratory only, n=21) and 12.43 (simulation only, n=18); the article's preceding prose gives different corrected means (16.283, 13.398 and 13.444), so the exact values are inconsistent within the source, though both sets rank the combined group highest.

"significant difference was found between the mean scores of the control group I in which the experiment method was applied and the experimental group in which analogy-based simulation method and laboratory method were applied together"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.