The three groups were equivalent on EPT pre-test scores before the intervention¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? One-way ANOVA found no significant difference among the pre-test scores of the experimental, control I and control II groups. → Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü & İbilge Dökme 2011

Evidence¶

Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü & İbilge Dökme 2011¶

Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü & İbilge Dökme. (2011). The effect of combining analogy-based simulation and laboratory activities on Turkish elementary school students' understanding of simple electric circuits. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojet

q2 · i? · causal · r2

One-way ANOVA on EPT pre-test scores of the three groups (n=66): F=1.06, p>.05; the article's sentence mislabels the non-significant result as "significant difference" while the p-value shows none.

"When the Table 4 was examined, it could be seen that there was significant difference (F 2-63=1.06, p>.05,) between the “EPT” pre-test scores of the students in experimental and control groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• All three learning environments produced statistically significant pre-test to post-test achievement gains in simple electricity — related
• Combining analogy-based simulation with laboratory activities produces significantly higher corrected post-test achievement in simple electricity than either environment alone — related
• Experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent on religious-concepts pretest before the intervention — related
• Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
• No significant pre-test difference existed between the two groups' entry listening knowledge — related
• Chatbot and search engine classes showed no significant baseline differences in science learning ability and knowledge before the intervention — related
• Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in pre-test science achievement before the intervention — related
• No significant achievement difference was found between laboratory-only and analogy-based simulation-only environments — related
• Groups were equivalent in mathematics achievement before the application — related
• No statistical difference was found between engineering and non-engineering participants on either APSS question, supporting conclusions about engineering students from the full STEM sample — related
• The three groups were statistically equivalent in transformational geometry achievement before instruction — related
• U-learning and E-learning groups were statistically equivalent at pretest before the intervention — related
• The experimental and control classes were statistically equivalent before the intervention on prior economics achievement — related
• The music and non-music groups did not differ significantly on the mathematics achievement pretest — related
• The three groups did not differ significantly on the pretest, supporting attribution of later differences to treatment — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)